IPO Analysis

OpenAI and Anthropic IPO Analysis

Both companies may go public in late 2026. One is targeting a $1 trillion valuation on $14 billion in projected losses. The other just raised at $380 billion on $14 billion in annualized revenue. This essay breaks down what the numbers say, what they don't, and how to think about buying either stock on day one.

The Two Biggest IPOs in AI History

OpenAI and Anthropic are racing each other to the public markets. Both companies have hired IPOInitial Public Offering — when a private company first sells shares to the public. counsel, started talks with investment banks, and are building out investor relations teams. Betting markets give Anthropic a 72% chance of listing before OpenAI.

These would be among the largest IPOs ever. For context, Saudi Aramco's 2019 IPO raised $25.6 billion at a $1.7 trillion valuation. Meta's 2012 IPO raised $16 billion at a $104 billion valuation. OpenAI and Anthropic could each be larger than Meta's listing.

If you're an individual investor, you'll probably have the chance to buy shares within the first few weeks of trading. The question is whether you should.

~$1T
OpenAI's rumored IPO valuation target
On a $20B annualized run rateRecent revenue projected over a full year. $5B last quarter = $20B run rate. and an estimated $14B in 2026 losses. That's roughly 50-65x revenue with no path to profitability before 2030.
$380B
Anthropic's latest private valuation (Feb 2026)
Set by a $30B funding round led by Coatue and GIC. Annualized revenue of $14B, with 80% coming from enterprise clients. Also not yet profitable.

The Numbers Behind the Hype

OpenAI went from roughly $6 billion in 2024 revenue to a $20 billion annualized run rate by the end of 2025. That growth rate is extraordinary. Google took seven years to hit $20 billion. Facebook took six. OpenAI did it in roughly two years from ChatGPT's launch.

But revenue growth is only half the story. The other half is the burn rate.

OpenAI: Revenue vs. Projected Cash Burn
In billions, estimated annually
Year Revenue Cash Burn Net Loss
2024 ~$6B ~$8B ~-$5B
2025 (est.) ~$13B ~$12B ~-$5B
2026 (proj.) ~$20B ~$17B ~-$14B
2027 (proj.) ~$30B ~$35B ~-$18B
2028 (proj.) ~$50B ~$47B ~-$15B

The cash burn is projected to increase for the next three years even as revenue grows. HSBC estimates OpenAI faces a $207 billion funding shortfall by 2030. That means the IPO isn't optional. OpenAI needs public market capital to survive.

When a company needs to go public to fund operations rather than choosing to go public from a position of strength, the dynamics are different. The pressure to raise capital gives Wall Street more leverage over pricing, dilution, and terms.

The Enterprise-First Model

Anthropic looks different from OpenAI in one critical way: its revenue mix. Roughly 80% of Anthropic's revenue comes from enterprise clients. OpenAI's consumer product (ChatGPT) generates a larger share of its revenue, which means higher churn risk and lower contract values.

Enterprise revenue is stickier. Companies that integrate Claude into their workflows don't switch providers on a whim. That makes Anthropic's $14 billion annualized revenue arguably more durable than OpenAI's $20 billion.

Anthropic's Valuation Trajectory
Private market valuation over time

Anthropic's valuation growth from 2023 to February 2026: Started at $18 billion in 2023, increased to $62 billion in March 2025, jumped to $183 billion in September 2025, and reached $380 billion in February 2026. This represents over a 20-fold increase in just three years.

2023 ($18B)
$18B
Mar 2025 ($62B)
$62B
Sep 2025 ($183B)
$183B
Feb 2026 ($380B)
$380B

Anthropic's valuation doubled in five months. That's the kind of markup that historically signals either a generational company or a private market bubble. Possibly both.

The $30 billion raise led by Coatue and GIC included investments from Microsoft and NVIDIA, both of which are also invested in OpenAI. Strategic investors hedging their bets across competitors is a signal worth noting. It means even the smartest money in the room isn't sure which company wins. For investors thinking about how to allocate capital across multiple AI bets, the framework in The AGI Portfolio sketches three portfolio structures keyed to different AGI timelines.

The Comparison That Matters

OpenAI vs. Anthropic: Key Metrics
As of early 2026, based on available public data
Metric OpenAI Anthropic
Annualized Revenue ~$20B ~$14B
Latest Valuation ~$500B (secondary) $380B
Price/Revenue ~25-50x ~27x
Revenue Mix Consumer + Enterprise 80% Enterprise
Key Product ChatGPT Claude API + Code
Profitable? No (est. 2030) No
Major Backers Microsoft, SoftBank Amazon, Google
Key Risk $79-134B Musk lawsuit Margin compression

Both companies are valued at roughly 27x their current annualized revenue. For comparison, Microsoft trades at about 13x revenue. Google trades at about 7x. Salesforce trades at about 8x. These AI companies are priced at 2-4x the multiples of the most expensive large-cap tech stocks.

That multiple implies the market expects both companies to grow revenue by 40-60% annually for several years while eventually achieving profit margins comparable to Google or Microsoft. That's possible. It's also the best-case scenario already baked into the price.

What Could Go Wrong on Day One

01
The Capital Absorption Problem
If OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX all IPO in late 2026, they could collectively seek $400-576 billion from public markets in a single quarter. The entire US IPO market raised $469 billion over the past decade. There may simply not be enough capital to absorb all three offerings at their target valuations. The first to list has an advantage. The last one gets whatever is left.
02
The Commodity Risk
Open-source AI models are improving quickly. Meta's Llama, Mistral, and other open models are closing the capability gap with GPT and Claude. If foundation models become commoditized, the current pricing power that drives both companies' revenue could erode. Neither company's valuation accounts for a scenario where their product becomes a commodity within five years.
03
The IPO Pop Trap
Hot IPOs often spike 30-80% on day one as retail investors pile in. Then the stock drifts down over the following months as insider lockup periods expire and early investors sell. Facebook traded below its IPO price for over a year after listing. If you buy the day-one pop at $1 trillion and the stock settles at $700 billion over the next 12 months, you're down 30% while the company's business might be fine.
04
The Lawsuit Wildcard (OpenAI)
Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI goes to trial in spring 2026. It seeks $79 to $134 billion in damages over the nonprofit-to-profit conversion. Even if the case is unlikely to succeed at that scale, it creates headline risk during the IPO roadshow. A bad ruling or damaging discovery could crater sentiment at the worst possible time.

How to Think About Buying

Consider Buying If

You have a 10+ year time horizon and believe AI will be the dominant computing platform (like the internet was). You plan to buy a small position (1-3% of portfolio) and add on any significant dip. You're comfortable with the stock potentially dropping 30-50% in the first year. You believe one of these companies will become the next Microsoft or Google, and you accept the risk that neither might.

Wait If

You need the money within 5 years. You can't stomach a 50% drawdown. You're buying because of FOMO rather than a thesis on the business model. You'd be allocating more than 5% of your portfolio to a single pre-profit company. History says the best entry point for most hot IPOs is 6-18 months after listing, once the hype cools and the first few earnings reports give real data on growth durability.

The most common mistake with IPOs like these: buying a large position on day one at peak excitement. The second most common mistake: never buying at all because the valuation always looks expensive, then watching the stock 5x over a decade.
27x Revenue
Both companies trade at roughly the same multiple. Both are unprofitable. Both could be worth trillions in a decade. The smart move isn't to avoid them or go all-in. It's to size the position for the risk and wait for the price to tell you something the hype can't.

How I Built This

Analysis based on public financial disclosures, private funding round announcements, investment bank research, and public reporting from CNBC, Fortune, Financial Times, and Reuters as of February 2026.

OpenAI Financials
Revenue, cash burn, and loss projections from HSBC research and public reporting
OpenAI does not publish audited financial statements. Revenue figures ($6B 2024, $20B annualized late 2025) come from company announcements and press reports. Cash burn and loss projections ($17B in 2026, $35B in 2027, $47B in 2028) come from HSBC analyst estimates. The $207B funding shortfall figure through 2030 is also from HSBC. These numbers will change as OpenAI prepares its S-1 filing.
Anthropic Financials
Valuation from Feb 2026 funding round; revenue from company statements
Anthropic's $380B valuation is from the $30B round closed February 2026, reported by CNBC. The $14B annualized revenue and 80% enterprise mix come from company statements and press reporting. Claude Code's $2.5B annualized revenue was disclosed around the same time. Anthropic does not publish detailed financials.
Valuation Multiples
Price-to-revenue calculated from latest private valuations
OpenAI's range (25-50x) reflects the spread between its $500B secondary sale valuation and a rumored $830B-$1T IPO target. Anthropic's 27x is $380B divided by $14B annualized revenue. Comparable public company multiples (Microsoft 13x, Google 7x) are approximate based on February 2026 market prices and trailing twelve month revenue.
Capital Market Capacity
$469B total US IPO proceeds, 2016-2025
The $469B figure and the potential $432-576B single-quarter demand from SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic are from analysis by venture capitalist Tomasz Tunguz. These are rough estimates based on standard IPO float percentages (5-10% of total shares) applied to each company's rumored valuation.
Jesse Walker
Jesse Walker has been an individual investor for 30 years. Before that, he was a poker professional, which is where he learned that the best decision and the best outcome aren't always the same thing. He writes about investing through the uncertainty of AI.

Nothing on this site constitutes investment advice. All content is for informational purposes only. Full terms.